3 ms·
Yes, the design will improve with time, that's for sure. Would a flat fee for participation sound better? How about "Pay $9 to bid in our next auction" ... an
by tfc 17y ago
Yes, the design will improve with time, that's for sure.
Would a flat fee for participation sound better? How about "Pay $9 to bid in our next auction" ... and get away from the donations and non-profit approach?
The reason for selecting your own car is so you end up with exactly what you want, from the dealer you want to go to for maintenance and repairs. Do you think it's better to name a specific car, and therefore remove the winner's right to select his own car and dealer?
- icey 17y agoI think that you just need to clarify what's going on. Calling something non-profit carries certain connotations; namely that the proceeds will somehow benefit a charity. My assumption is that you're trying to spin this as being towards a car instead of a raffle to win $20k for legal or tax purposes. You may want to talk to a lawyer to see what other options are available to you.
- tfc 17y agoI changed it from not-for-profit to commercial. It's still free for everyone to bid, with an optional $9 seat upgrade which moves you to the head of the line so you can bid sooner. My lawyer says that since bidding is free and the payment is optional and only changes your position on the waiting list I should be okay.