3 ms·
What I found interesting was not that it was a lawyer doing their own work, but that the company was a restaurant and beer spinoff from a legal practice, that s
by moocowduckquack 13y ago
What I found interesting was not that it was a lawyer doing their own work, but that the company was a restaurant and beer spinoff from a legal practice, that so far appears to have had very little to do with clothing. If it was a clothing company that was trying to trademark the use of bitcoin for a line of clothing, that would be one thing, but this seems far more speculative an endeavor.
- iondream 13y agoSeems like a money laundering op from the blurb. Any criminal record?
- eru 13y agoCOMS (hellbanned) wrote the following: He was involved with Crown Bar and Winston's, two "trendy" expensive LA bars that were popular many years ago. From his website (KAGLEW.COM), about trademarks- http://ale811.wix.com/restaurantgroupla#!Trademark-Considera.. http://ale811.wix.com/restaurantgroupla#!Trademark-Considera.... "The name must not be descriptive" "Stay out of the dictionary. If your prospective mark can be found in a dictionary, it has meaning and will be a poor candidate for a trademark." That's cut and pasted from a document on http://patentax.com/ http://patentax.com/ which also advocates bar owners patenting designs of chairs, shelves and dinnerware.