To avoid the slippery slope, couldn't there be a jury system that could decide the genuineness and applicability of a case of euthanasia? Leaving it only in the

To avoid the slippery slope, couldn't there be a jury system that could decide the genuineness and applicability of a case of euthanasia? Leaving it only in the hands of a single person, be it the patient, or doctor or relative is bound to attract criticism. But if a jury can sentence one to a life-sentence in a crime case, they could arguably be trusted to deal a similar sentence for someone terminally ill.