4 ms·
>burn a copy of Lolita. No children were harmed or molested in the making of literature. That's a different topic to actual, real-life photographic CP.
by marquis 13y ago
>burn a copy of Lolita.
No children were harmed or molested in the making of literature. That's a different topic to actual, real-life photographic CP.
- venomsnake 13y agoIt is a bit more complicated - IIRC - the legality status is extremely fuzzy especially with works that are not literature - I think there were lawsuits with some hentai and manga in both Sweden and Canada. And it seems it is unclear in US too. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_status_of_cartoon_pornography_depicting_minors#18_USC_1466A http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_status_of_cartoon_pornogr...
- pcwalton 13y ago> No children were harmed or molested in the making of literature. That's a different topic to actual, real-life photographic CP. That isn't what the US statutes use to differentiate between legal and illegal, however; rather the Miller test is what applies.