the 'contractor' role would be of ambiguity illegality. however, outsourcing the job(s) to an external, possibly offshore or cross-border firm that specializes

the 'contractor' role would be of ambiguity illegality. however, outsourcing the job(s) to an external, possibly offshore or cross-border firm that specializes in low-wage workers with a puppet CEO who's actually a supervisor would do the trick nicely. then, of course, the 'janitorial' firm would be owned or otherwise controlled by a parent company where the execs make much more money, since they are either a) not bound by compensation rules or b) don't hire anyone under a certain salary