4 ms·
This would be very hard to achieve in Switzerland. For one, Swiss law places a big emphasis on acting in good faith. If an employer were to hire permanent emplo
by phlo 13y ago
This would be very hard to achieve in Switzerland. For one, Swiss law places a big emphasis on acting in good faith. If an employer were to hire permanent employees as "contractors", courts would be likely to reject that argument.
Secondly, social security is structured a bit differently from the U.S. version: Contributions are taken out of employee's salaries (and matched by the employer). Contractors would be required to act as commercial entities and contribute themselves. This would require a fair bit of paperwork -- not something you'd expect a low-wage employee to complete. And if they'd fail to complete and submit the paperwork, social security would take action against said contractors or -- more likely, imo -- against the original employer.
Thirdly, self-employed persons face some extra paperwork for their tax declarations. A big shift from employees to self-employed people would be noticable (and, going back to point 1, likely to be rejected by the courts).
By the way: the proposal included language specifically prohibiting outsourcing the leadership of a company to another company.
- jdlshore 13y ago> Secondly, social security is structured a bit differently from the U.S. version: Contributions are taken out of employee's salaries (and matched by the employer). Contractors would be required to act as commercial entities and contribute themselves. Actually, that's exactly how social security is taxed in the U.S. People call that matching tax "self-employment tax." :-)
- ars 13y ago> hire permanent employees as "contractors" The company doesn't hire them directly. They hire a third party and that third party hires the contractors (or employees for that matter).