He may indeed have looked at some scans, and judged that one was "obviously pathological". But where does this imply that there already was a link between bein

He may indeed have looked at some scans, and judged that one was "obviously pathological". But where does this imply that there already was a link between being a serial killer and brain scans? All it states was that he considered that particular scan (that belonged to him, it turns out) to be pathological. Also, even if he did find such a link, I can't find any publications by him on this link.