4 ms·
A shared wallet, not the "shared wallet" service. Many services use them internally, they're in no way a trap. > CoinJoin is nice too, but it does not look wel
by nwh 13y ago
A shared wallet, not the "shared wallet" service. Many services use them internally, they're in no way a trap.
> CoinJoin is nice too, but it does not look well in the eyes of "anti-structuring" laws.
Neither is a system that flings around your wallet contents all the time.
- oleganza 13y agoAny service can share its operations with an adversary. That's a risk. If you don't understand that, then you should prefer Digicash to Bitcoin as it's more anonymous, confirms transactions instantly and does not need any stupid mining. System that flings around my wallet contents does not leave a trace of that activity on the blockchain. Meaning of every transaction is known only to transacting parties, but not to anyone else. That's the big difference from any shared wallet, where operator sees the meaning of all transactions going through it.