3 ms·
Which questions did they address? Doesn't seem like they said anything. The comment that teams could use existing code, but not use products that were already
by drakaal 13y ago
Which questions did they address? Doesn't seem like they said anything.
The comment that teams could use existing code, but not use products that were already released or in development seems in conflict with the allegation that the winning team demoed the product weeks before the contest started.
"Once we complete our review of the final entries, we will post our findings here. " Is in conflict with the title... More like "Sometime when everyone has forgotten we WILL BE addressing questions"
-Not a Dreamforce Participant.
- jzwinck 13y agoWhat is the difference between existing code and an existing product made of code, for the purpose of reusing code? The distinction (which I understand is not your own creation) seems forced, if not ambiguous.
- drakaal 13y agoCode doesn't come with a business model. A product does. Code doesn't come with User Feedback and refinements based on real world testing. A Product does.
- yo-mf 13y agoPlenty of "products" also do not have a business model. So code posted on Github that gets comments would be a product? Really sounds like you are quibbling. The statement about "existing code" was ambiguous for a reason...
- colabi 13y agounfortunately, they are also in a bind by stating that only the new work would be judged. @aliciatweet cites that it looks like they webview'd their existing site (would have to be verified). so, that means they judged using a webview as a million dollar contribution? my guess is that the call happened in which partners were allowed in with existing tech. and that information was never passed to the judging team with specific reference as to work accomplished within the hack period. possibly an innocent mistake or specifically designed to pass people through.