Apparently there is a lot of people that believe they are rockstars and they don't need the job, the job needs them. Here's a novel idea: both the candidate an

Apparently there is a lot of people that believe they are rockstars and they don't need the job, the job needs them. Here's a novel idea: both the candidate and the job need each other. If the job didn't need a candidate, then why are you looking to hire someone new? Humility goes both ways. So does the arrogance. You reap what you sow. I'd rather hire a junior that is committed than a senior that is not. As long as you're prepared to deal with the difference between the output of a junior and the output of a senior, then you're okay. Word of advice, though: you'd best hold on to your own seniors.