4 ms·
How does something this bad end up the top comment? Three out of four links you provided are completely irrelevant. It is not missing pipes. Pipes are a simp
by asdasf 13y ago
How does something this bad end up the top comment? Three out of four links you provided are completely irrelevant. It is not missing pipes. Pipes are a simple composition operator. Haskell already has that, no need to make a special version for this.
- klrr 13y agoWhile it's true that you can't really pipe programs conveniently yet it sure supports composition with all functions as you suggest. Just wanted to note in case that was what the comment above was thinking about. Except that I pretty much agree with you, current top comment is crap.