4 ms·
A crypto monoculture seems dangerous, too. A single implementation sounds naively attractive but it also represents a single point of failure. I’d rather have
by mwsherman 13y ago
A crypto monoculture seems dangerous, too. A single implementation sounds naively attractive but it also represents a single point of failure.
I’d rather have many imperfect-and-actively-improving implementations, than a single implementation that is widely relied upon and fails.