4 ms·

"But if the only job that will make you happy is covering "important stuff"" That's the ONLY job we're discussing here. A journalist, you know. Every single "o

"But if the only job that will make you happy is covering "important stuff"" That's the ONLY job we're discussing here. A journalist, you know. Every single "opportunity" you have listed isn't journalism, those are corporate PR gigs. Real estate news for a blog of a realtor? Seriously? And a hundred of those will be a worthy replacement for New York Times? Blogs aren't new. Five years ago every corporate web site had a "news" section and now it's fashionable to call it a "blog". So that's what journalism school graduates should be wasting their lives writing, and I should be reading from now on? So instead of semi-independent media we'll just have a million little press-releases Working for a "newspaper replacement" isn't limiting, it is actually quite ambitious, especially compared to the PR career you have suggested. No wonder that girl was mad at you. And don't pose as some kind of visionary and don't call someone's ambitions "limiting". Face it: you just want someone else's content to aggregate, i.e. profit from. And you seem to care very little of what that content happens to be. Lets repeat the exercise: how can a young and ambitious reporter find resources to do a high-quality reporting (i.e. not press releases) on toxic food in supermarkets, the war in Iraq, corruption in a state senate, etc? Which "real estate broker" will pay for that?

brandnewlow 17y ago
You sound like one of the anti-linking people. Also, if writing for a wire service isn't journalism, I don't know what is. The problem with it is that you don't get a byline and you have to churn out boilerplate stories at a prodigious pace.
- old-gregg 17y ago
  I am not one of the anti-linking people, although it sure may serve as a convenient "argument" to you here. The issue in question is you don't seem to be concerned with the media as a 4th branch of the government, you don't see the independent press as crucial component of our political system. I'm quite active politically, and what I have learned is that we, as citizens, have the only tool at our disposal which we can use to fight back against corrupt politicians and various interest groups: i.e. call for a massive media attention. At first glance, Internet should help here big time, right? Well, wrong: Independent web campaigns just don't work: it takes a lot of time and momentum to become visible, often you need the public to intervene ASAP: sometimes it's about saving city parks, sometimes its about public outrage against converting a public interstate highway (paid for with taxpayers dollars) into a toll road controlled by an out-of-state company, sometimes its about ah fuck it, HN is clearly the wrong venue for this. Entrepreneurial programmers simply seek "data" they can crawl and re-post with their own ads, who gives a flying fuck about 4th branches and all that boring offline stuff, right?
  - Retric 17y ago
    What balance is modern media placing on the government compared to what blogs are doing? From what I have seen blogs have done more to vet political candidates than the main stream media. Read up on who actually broke major issues. From what I have seen over the last year "blogs" have done about as much to balance government excess as the entirety of main stream media combined.
  - randallsquared 17y ago
    If you want the media to be a 4th branch of government (not that I'm in favor of it!), amend the Constitution and fund it the same way the other 3 get funded. If you want it to be independent of the government, then you'll have to come up with some way to fund it that doesn't depend either on direct funding or the backdoor funding of making it illegal to innovate in the field.

brandnewlow 17y ago

You sound like one of the anti-linking people. Also, if writing for a wire service isn't journalism, I don't know what is. The problem with it is that you don't get a byline and you have to churn out boilerplate stories at a prodigious pace.

old-gregg 17y ago
I am not one of the anti-linking people, although it sure may serve as a convenient "argument" to you here. The issue in question is you don't seem to be concerned with the media as a 4th branch of the government, you don't see the independent press as crucial component of our political system. I'm quite active politically, and what I have learned is that we, as citizens, have the only tool at our disposal which we can use to fight back against corrupt politicians and various interest groups: i.e. call for a massive media attention. At first glance, Internet should help here big time, right? Well, wrong: Independent web campaigns just don't work: it takes a lot of time and momentum to become visible, often you need the public to intervene ASAP: sometimes it's about saving city parks, sometimes its about public outrage against converting a public interstate highway (paid for with taxpayers dollars) into a toll road controlled by an out-of-state company, sometimes its about ah fuck it, HN is clearly the wrong venue for this. Entrepreneurial programmers simply seek "data" they can crawl and re-post with their own ads, who gives a flying fuck about 4th branches and all that boring offline stuff, right?
- Retric 17y ago
  What balance is modern media placing on the government compared to what blogs are doing? From what I have seen blogs have done more to vet political candidates than the main stream media. Read up on who actually broke major issues. From what I have seen over the last year "blogs" have done about as much to balance government excess as the entirety of main stream media combined.
- randallsquared 17y ago
  If you want the media to be a 4th branch of government (not that I'm in favor of it!), amend the Constitution and fund it the same way the other 3 get funded. If you want it to be independent of the government, then you'll have to come up with some way to fund it that doesn't depend either on direct funding or the backdoor funding of making it illegal to innovate in the field.