3 ms·
I think it is the option for writing with any degree of complexity: articles, theses, books, etc. Word processing (and Word in particular) pales in comparison.
by naish 19y ago
I think it is the option for writing with any degree of complexity: articles, theses, books, etc. Word processing (and Word in particular) pales in comparison. Having all of the bookkeeping and style taken care of for indices, lists, contents, cross references, citations, etc. makes it very nice to work with. I convert everyone I can...
- npk 19y agotexMacs is great, but is a non-option for many scientists. A large fraction of us are switching to OSX. texMacs runs slowly on osx, but worst, it looks ugly running on a mac. I use texshop, it's not a texmacs replacement in terms of features, yet, i like it better on my mac.
- amichail 19y agoCan't you convince a few key conferences/journals to accept TeXmacs submissions? For just how much longer do they expect to use TeX anyway?