3 ms·
I advance the possibility that your thinking about programming languages has become, to paraphrase The Dude, way too uptight. Is a telescope a proprietary sour
by taliesinb 13y ago
I advance the possibility that your thinking about programming languages has become, to paraphrase The Dude, way too uptight.
Is a telescope a proprietary source? Is a commercially manufactured CCD a proprietary source? Maybe they got the response curve wrong! Okay, test it before you announce your galactic dust measurement paper! I take that attitude towards "experimental mathematics" that involve computers in some deep way.
And no need to patronize with Wikipedia links, I know the story about the Mars Climate Orbiter. And I don't think it even demonstrates your point. As I understand it, vxWorks, which many of the NASA missions use, is closed source. You have to pay to see the source. And I'm sure that Wolfram Research would or could do the same thing for e.g. intelligence agencies (and hopefully will do for everyone in the future, fingers crossed).
Let me do some patronizing of my own: are you sure your understanding of what the language does is up to date? You seem to talk of it as if it were a predominantly a CAS: http://reference.wolfram.com/language/index.html http://reference.wolfram.com/language/index.html
- lutusp 13y ago> And no need to patronize with Wikipedia links ... Translation: "Don't document your claims like a scientist. What kind of conversation do you think this is?" > As I understand it, vxWorks ... Not relevant to the discussion except as another example of the dangers of closed-source systems.