3 ms·
What are your goals and strengths? I am not familiar with the state of most of those projects, but fixing bugs and completing todo items is welcome anywhere, I
by nswanberg 13y ago
What are your goals and strengths? I am not familiar with the state of most of those projects, but fixing bugs and completing todo items is welcome anywhere, I imagine, and if your goal is to improve free software then any of those seem a good choice. That's not a very exciting answer, though.
I suggested Mathics because you appear to be interested in what Mathematica can do but resent that it closed source. Since it does not appear that it will be open sourced soon (Taliesin discussed this elsewhere and I got a similar answer from Stephen in an AMA http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/tmutz/stephen_wolfram_nks_10th_anniversary/c4nz7pi http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/tmutz/stephen_wolfram_...), and because duplicating even a portion of a system with a 25-year head start would require a massive amount of effort, it seems the best choice would be to work on a program that would best organize the efforts of the other programs. To agree with that statement one probably has to agree that the language is the best one to build a system around.
- jordigh 13y agoI'm not actually interested in Mathematica itself. I just know it can do lots of things that the free CASes can't. I currently work on Octave because there's so much Matlab code out there that needs to be liberated. Is it the same case with Mathematica code? Are people able to easily take their code from Mathematica and run it in Mathics?
- sn6uv 13y agoThat's the idea! In practise, we're still getting there and you may have to work around functions not yet implemented in Mathics. I'd really like to see Mathics become the Octave of Mathematica.