4 ms·
I think the trick is the "equivalent" part. If I got it right, they are using some sort of fuel which provides 1/3 of the energy regular gasoline does. Which
by scscsc 17y ago
I think the trick is the "equivalent" part. If I got it right, they are using some sort of fuel which provides 1/3 of the energy regular gasoline does. Which means they are probably doing 110/3 mpg on this type of fuel.
- TrevorJ 17y agoThat may be true, but it still sounds a bit insane. This is orders of power better than conventional results.
- lutorm 17y agoIt doesn't matter what the fuel is. You get the same amount of energy out of it, so it's no easier running 110*3/2 mpg on E85 (which is 2/3 the energy density) than 110mpg on gas.