3 ms·
You probably should read the talk page to get the info on the video that they argue over source Full length version of the suzuki produced video is here: http:
by Amadou 13y ago
You probably should read the talk page to get the info on the video that they argue over source
Full length version of the suzuki produced video is here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q2Bv9WL3vpY http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q2Bv9WL3vpY
Basically, CU has an agenda.
Worst case, CU had an agenda in this specific case. CU does not have a history of bias on anything even approaching a regular basis. Given the disproportionate amount of money available to CU versus what most big manufacturing corporations have available for litigation if CU did have an agenda of untruthfulness, it would have been sued into oblivion long ago.
- protomyth 13y ago"Worst case, CU had an agenda in this specific case." Given all the extra testing to make it fail, they had an agenda. People with agenda's don't stop with one thing, and most auto manufactures will let is slide due to the difficulty of suing the press. It was so blatant in the Suzuki case that they went for it. CU is pretty useless for testing autos. Heck, they did their oil test wrong (cabs - 24x7 so the oil was hot) ignoring the more dangerous times for oil (cold starts). It sounded good and I guess that's what counts.