3 ms·
Then we move to the next worse example; the majority defines what the minority is or is not doing.
by talmand 13y ago
Then we move to the next worse example; the majority defines what the minority is or is not doing.
- nknighthb 13y agoAt this point you're just trolling.
- talmand 13y agoHmmm, I thought I was giving thoughtful responses to your posts. After all, you read my first response about screwing the minority and your answer seemed to suggest your are fully willing to do so. If you're willing to accept one terrible aspect of democracy you should be willing to embrace it all. Not mildly attacking someone for pointing out your potential defects. I'm only trying to help. Now I think I'm trolling, but it's a natural response due to your posts.
- cpleppert 13y agoThis is how any parliamentary body on the planet works. If you are concerned about this from a constitutional perspective you do exactly what the founders did: separate legislative powers into equal chambers. If you place constitutional requirements above a majority vote on a parliamentary body then the judiciary has to step in and enforce those requirements violating the separation of powers.