4 ms·
This framework is so much further along than Bootstrap is, and the team at Zurb seems to iterate much faster then the Bootstrap team.
by chrisblackwell 13y ago
This framework is so much further along than Bootstrap is, and the team at Zurb seems to iterate much faster then the Bootstrap team.
- at-fates-hands 13y agoI started to notice that and have since moved over to it now. The feature updates and add-ons are coming much faster with Foundation than Bootstrap IMO.
- khalilravanna 13y agoOne thing to note is that while both frameworks are open source, Foundation is backed by a company (Zurb).
- kyriakos 13y agoI believe Foundation is much better for front-end design than Bootstrap. The main benefit of Bootstrap is in backend design because it managed to get more popular and consequently its much easier to find 'bootstrap ready' js based widgets etc
- lowboy 13y agoMaybe I'm misunderstanding what you're saying, but how does Bootstrap's popularity make it better for backend design?
- KaoruAoiShiho 13y agoI think he's confusing javascript with "backend".
- colinramsay 13y agoBackend as in administration systems, rather than frontend which is client-facing?
- stevejohnson 13y agoThat's my interpretation of the comment, and real-world experience. I've written two admin sites with Bootstrap because it has all the widgets and plugins I might need on short notice.
- kyriakos 13y agoThats exactly what I meant. Sorry for the confusion!
- flipchart 13y agoI use Bootstrap exclusively, but I've played with Foundation (back on version 3). But honestly, I can't see what the difference in the frameworks are. Do you have a reference comparing them so that I could see what I'm missing?