I used Wikipedia as source and in that article Jawa Report was mentioned as original source. I don't follow that blog, Your ignorance of your sources does not

I used Wikipedia as source and in that article Jawa Report was mentioned as original source. I don't follow that blog, Your ignorance of your sources does not change anything. The Jawa Report is still wrong 99.99% of the time. Citing them does not prove that profiling works, it proves profiling does not work because the false positive rate is through the roof. If all terrorist starting to act like old ladies playing solitaire, we would know because you are already profiling those groups who would do that. You have this unfounded belief that profiling is effective, as if the people trying to evade profiling are dumber than the people doing the profiling - despite one being a bureaucracy and the other being a bunch of loosely-affiliated individuals able complete freedom to change tactics on a dime. Everything you say follows from that. Telling me to "think" doesn't make it any more true, all it does is prove you don't have any facts to support your conclusions. Everything you've cited has been proof to the contrary of your own claims. You would preferred if Lars Vilks was actually murder by her. Yes, that's exactly what I wanted. Spelling out how you are wrong, how everything you cite has racist connotations means I am evil. I'm going to take that accusation as proof of unwilling concession on your part and end the discussion here.