3 ms·
That makes no sense. If they were inherently worthless then no one would pay to play them. You mistakenly conflate cost to produce with value to consumers. O
by crusso 13y ago
That makes no sense. If they were inherently worthless then no one would pay to play them.
You mistakenly conflate cost to produce with value to consumers. Obviously the content has value to consumers.
- cheesylard 13y agoPeople only pay for them because they don't have any other choice. If it was legal to sponsor an Android fork that had a pirate version of the Play Store, I'm sure all of the hardware manufacturers would be shipping it with their phones.
- crusso 13y agoThat's irrelevant. You said that the games were "inherently worthless". You're attempting to twist the language so words don't mean what most people think they mean and I'm not buying it.
- cheesylard 13y agoFine, you are correct. I didn't think you were nitpicking my choice of words. They should be worthless.