hahahah - yes, so true. Actually in this article, when I re-read it, I think it is written in a sort of ironic/fun tone. Although I love clojure, I understand

hahahah - yes, so true. Actually in this article, when I re-read it, I think it is written in a sort of ironic/fun tone. Although I love clojure, I understand the disappointment in not being "lisp all the way down" - there is something satisfying about the purity of that approach, if it is practical. Maybe one day...