As we have discussed with you previously, we have come to the opinion that , based on the evidence we have to date, that agent(s) of your company have e

As we have discussed with you previously, we have come to the opinion that , based on the evidence we have to date, that agent(s) of your company have engaged in sockpuppetry or meatpuppetry to, among other things, make it appear as if certain articles are written by unbiased sources when in fact those articles are authored by Wiki-PR for money. I was not expecting to see "sockpuppetry" or "meatpuppetry" in a cease and desist! In general I wouldn't expect lawyers to use company-specific jargon in external communications. What are they trying to do?