3 ms·
I thought this usage arose from dropping the word "of" after "because". "Because of" wasn't mentioned anywhere in the article.
by axus 13y ago
I thought this usage arose from dropping the word "of" after "because". "Because of" wasn't mentioned anywhere in the article.
- code_duck 13y agoIt is, in the beginning: > It can be followed either by a finite clause (I'm reading this because [I saw it on the web]) or by a prepositional phrase (I'm reading this because [of the web]). Seems to me that you are correct, this 'new usage' is merely the latter usage without 'of'.