This is the official policy: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(organizations_and_companies) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(

This is the official policy: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(organizations_and_companies) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(organizat... The short version that will cover 95% of cases, though, is that it's less about "worthiness" and more about existence of decent third-party sources you can cite. If a company is discussed in books, articles, etc. that aren't written by the company itself, then an article on the company that cites those sources for its information will rarely cause issues. Actually that applies to just about any topic: a well-sourced article more or less trumps other concerns. The bigger issue here is that Wiki-PR's articles are exceptionally likely to be biased. Even in cases where the company should have a Wikipedia article, it should be a neutral one, and cover both positive and negative aspects of the company.