What a hateful article. It twists mundane, reasonable daily interactions to make women seem downright evil. Just one example: Sex is coveted by men. According

What a hateful article. It twists mundane, reasonable daily interactions to make women seem downright evil. Just one example: Sex is coveted by men. Accordingly, women limit access as a way of maintaining advantage in the negotiation of this resource. Women who make sex too readily available compromise the power-holding position of the group, which is why many women are particularly intolerant of women who are, or seem to be, promiscuous. What a ridiculous thing to say. Women limit access as a way of maintaining some power advantage? Really? There isn't a simpler, less sinister explanation for why a woman might decline sex with anyone and everyone who asks? The main example of the article doesn't hold any water either. I mean, the test subject's outfit is downright grotesque, especially in a classroom setting. She is wearing a skirt so short that she could not possibly sit down without showing her underwear, not to mention the rest of her outfit - her top is cut so low that I can see her bra sticking out. No wonder another student commented, "What the eff is that". That's not "hostility" and "cold war", that's a completely normal reaction. If a male student showed up in class wearing lycra short-shorts exposing his package and a neon shirt cut down to his mid-section, you don't think male students would react the same way?