3 ms·
First off, I appreciate the points this post highlights and it's encouraged me to check my own site which has two items blocked by Ghostery - google analytics a
by oneeyedpigeon 13y ago
First off, I appreciate the points this post highlights and it's encouraged me to check my own site which has two items blocked by Ghostery - google analytics and typekit. Fair enough on the former, the latter is less understandable, although I guess that any third-party javascript requests can expose the user to tracking, so I still don't have a problem with that. That leads me onto my main point:
As soon as you outsource functionality, you give up layers of control. The relevant website is outsourcing not only to Disqus for comments, but blogger; the author then complains that they don't have as much control over their content - go figure. I've never really considered that the benefits of disqus outweigh the disadvantages - why not just own your own comments, have more control over them, deliver a faster experience, etc.?
- GhotiFish 13y agoa well made comment system is a fair amount of work, and you are vulnerable to spam. I agree with you though, it's not worth having disqus whore your patrons to the highest bidder and make product suggestions in your name.
- oneeyedpigeon 13y agoAgreed; but I'd rather have the problem solved server-side, and allow a publication to own its comments. That said, comments in general appear to be falling out of favour.