It's a growing consensus insofar as I've researched it three or so years ago. Dissent then came mostly between two extremes. Namely: "Interesting take, but the

It's a growing consensus insofar as I've researched it three or so years ago. Dissent then came mostly between two extremes. Namely: "Interesting take, but the body can process a lot more sugar than Lustig suggests before becoming sick", and "NO NO NO! [That's not what I learned and believe is true!] Low-carb food is baaaad!" Speaking personally, the first end of that spectrum stroke me as forming reasonable objections. The second end stroke me as quacks and curmudgeons on roughly the same level as economists -- i.e. they'll dismiss anything that won't fit their worldview, including evidence and reproducible facts.