The weakness I saw in The Camel Has Two Humps was the lumping together of the consistently correct and the consistently incorrent. See http://lambda-the-ultimat

The weakness I saw in The Camel Has Two Humps was the lumping together of the consistently correct and the consistently incorrent. See http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/1624#comment-19778 http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/1624#comment-19778 Trying to deduce anything from the success of the consistently correct group is fraught. It sure looks like they have some prior exposure. The interest lies in the consistently incorrect group. Perhaps their success points to the importance of having a consistent model, to be corrected by instruction. Or perhaps the consistently incorrect group all failed. We don't know how many were in this group and if there were very few the aggregation of the correct and incorrect into a single group could completely wash their fate out of the overall statistics.