Wow, it's the outsourcing version of the urban legend where you get something of extraordinary quality at a low price from a foreign land, only to discover...

Wow, it's the outsourcing version of the urban legend where you get something of extraordinary quality at a low price from a foreign land, only to discover... http://www.snopes.com/critters/lurkers/mexicanpet.asp http://www.snopes.com/critters/lurkers/mexicanpet.asp http://www.snopes.com/horrors/insects/cactus.asp http://www.snopes.com/horrors/insects/cactus.asp http://www.snopes.com/critters/snakes/coat.asp http://www.snopes.com/critters/snakes/coat.asp As for the license incompatibility, it's kinda hard to see the game console manufacturers licensing anyone to create a derived work from their SDKs under the GPL. That's a natural consequence of their well-known business model where they use their intellectual property rights to require licenses to develop for their console. As it is, Atari violated both the GPL and Nintendo's license, so there can't necessarily be the release-the-code-and-all-is-well ending you would want here.