2 ms·
My problem (and I think a lot of other people's) is not with the arbitrariness of lines so much as the fact that you can run a longer program through a very dum
by chc 13y ago
My problem (and I think a lot of other people's) is not with the arbitrariness of lines so much as the fact that you can run a longer program through a very dumb minifier and get a "short" program just by sacrificing readability. It's still very much the same program; we're just rewarding people for making it harder for us to read. This problem isn't solved by switching the requirement to bytes. I would sooner accept a token limit than a byte limit, because it's harder to elide tokens to the point of unreadability in most languages.
- etler 13y agoI think the fairest way to do it and keep readability is to have the minified code be the byte count and also provide the unminified version as well.