3 ms·
The thing is, I was responding to this: > This is a very accurate description Which you've very conveniently omitted.
by saraid216 13y ago
The thing is, I was responding to this:
> This is a very accurate description
Which you've very conveniently omitted.
- anoncowherd 13y agoI wasn't talking to you though, unless you're a sock-puppeteer, but whatever. > The thing is, I was responding to this: >> This is a very accurate description Is it not? >>> I think Google is trying to inflate its G+ numbers in order to seem competitive with Facebook, so its basically a dick-size contest with users getting caught in the middle. At any rate, my point still stands. This is not a formal debate.