4 ms·
He's got several years as a staff writer on a hit TV show, and his magazine publishing experience before that. The gap is real, and obviously important, but wh
by rst 13y ago
He's got several years as a staff writer on a hit TV show, and his magazine publishing experience before that. The gap is real, and obviously important, but what came before is a lot more than "fluff".
- dragontamer 13y agoHe is _MISSING_ fluff. He just needs some job, ANY job that proves that he wasn't wasting his time during the gap. He clearly has real world working experience. But any resume that is missing out on even a couple of months worth of experience signals a red flag to me. This is the culture of corporate America. Holes are EXTREMELY bad in your resume. Period.
- aridiculous 13y agoI'm curious as to why holes are so bad in the eyes of an employer? Is it a fear of non-compliance?
- dragontamer 13y agoThere is no logic in it. Holes are bad because holes are bad. I'm sure I can make up a reason for you, but IMO, its better to cut out the bullshit and just tell it to you straight. Holes in a resume are bad because most people who look at resumes think that holes are a bad thing. Its simply the bias that exists in most jobs (that I've come across... anyway)
- NAFV_P 13y agoIt suggests that: you are a lazy piece of shit you were incarcerated for bank robbery you were on the run from the Feds living in Argentina you went to Pakistan to attend a Jihadist training course (BTEC-diploma) you were kidnapped by aliens and given daily anal probes (that never impresses the interviewers) you were being trained in cutting-edge industrial espionage techniques by a rival company of the interviewer you spent the time going through sex-reassignment procedures and changed your name to Gladys you worked for the NSA The average interviewer will think all of the above and more in the space of two milliseconds, whether any of these delusional thoughts have any basis in reality.