3 ms·

I don't want this to start into another debate. For most companies, its either Microsoft or Java stack. There isn't too much in between. And frankly its not a

I don't want this to start into another debate. For most companies, its either Microsoft or Java stack. There isn't too much in between. And frankly its not a bad stack when money is not a factor in deciding the stack.Most companies whose core business isn't software just want to get their job done. Microsoft works well in this space and will continue to do so. Frankly, with Java being part of Oracle, I feel there is an even more push to Microsoft. Obviously this is my opinion but I don't believe I will running out of work any time soon on the Microsoft stack.

derefr 13y ago
> For most companies, its either Microsoft or Java stack. There isn't too much in between. I find it odd that the "Unix stack" isn't considered a horse in this race.
- ebiester 13y ago
  So which of them work well with Oracle, SQL Server, and DB2 drivers? Your average fortune 500 company isn't moving to PostgreSQL for the hell of it. They're running on top of unix, but it all comes down to the database. And the java and .NET drivers are the best options. Rails has oracle and DB2 options, but how many people are using them? How well are they supported? How many people are around if you run into problems? What list of consultants can you hire when an advanced problem comes up? Otherwise, you're stuck with a labyrinth of ETL jobs between the main DB and your internal app. That's not going to bode well, especially with JRuby around. The other option is writing your business logic in the JVM and doing rest calls between that and your front end. I've heard multiple discussions of this (and even seen it done a few times.) But that's not getting rid of the JVM.