5 ms·

PiCloud has joined Dropbox

47 points by aseidl 13y ago

ibejoeb 13y ago
Oh man, two things: first, I wonder what DropBox will do with PiCloud, and second, I feel like a dodged a bullet. I kinda hate saying that, since it always turns up on these threads, but it's just true. I had been working seriously on converting a financial application to run on PiCloud. It's mid-November. In the hundred days until they cease operations, I would have had to deal with 10-K filings for my clients and scramble to get the hell out of there, just in time for Q1. What an absolute mess that would have been. No other time would have been much better, and I know there's an API compatible replacement in the works, but I've been there, and I'm sure something would have freaked out. Whatever happened to having some kind of reasonable transition period where the buyer continues to support all of its clients? PiCloud, your product was really neat. DropBox, I really wish you wouldn't just hit it and quit it.
- cschmidt 13y ago
  I think it is pretty clear from the wording it is an aqi-hire by DropBox. They are just getting a talented team. I am very close to launching Predictobot.com, which uses PiCloud for all of its computation. I spent last week moving to Heroku after DotCloud's pivot, and now I'll need to replace PiCloud. The web sure is a stable place.
  - ChuckMcM 13y ago
    "The web sure is a stable place." This is an interesting variation on this round's "boomlet". So in the previous dot.com boom there were lots of companies who didn't have revenue so they appeared, until the cash ran out and then fell back to earth. Now we can start a company with much less money, but they go poof in an aquihire when things go squishy. So was it a pricing issue? or a customer acquisition issue? How is it that so many of these companies get into this squeeze? Is it a chicken -/- egg thing where you can't price it to be self sustaining until you get critical mass? Or is it that Amazon, Google, and Microsoft are just sucking all the oxygen out of this space?
  - BerislavLopac 13y ago
    Which brings up another observation: when starting a business, sure take advantage of all those practical and inexpensive tools that can help you build your product in record time. But as soon as you start getting some serious traction and money (income or investment), don't hesitate to replace them with something you have more control over. Hm, it would be interesting to see open-source, self-hosted equivalents of useful services like PiCloud and the like.
kunle 13y ago
Just checked out www.multyvac.com, which has webvan, boo.com, etoys and lehman brothers listed as customers. What's the joke? Not sure I get it.
- cschmidt 13y ago
  I guess just that they are there to pick up the pieces from PiCloud, like someone should have done for those other failures.
- vjoel 13y ago
  Probably a reference to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multivac https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multivac.
- vecter 13y ago
  It's a reference to "The Last Question" by Isaac Asimov: http://filer.case.edu/dts8/thelastq.htm http://filer.case.edu/dts8/thelastq.htm
cschmidt 13y ago
As a very happy user of PiCloud, I'm sad to see it go. It is a shame they had such A-list VC's (Andreessen Horowitz, Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, and Greylock Partners), who don't have an interest in just a good solid business. They only wanted a huge, home run. I've been looking around for a good replacement, and there is a gap. PiCloud really had three components. The first was an ability to run code with arbitrary dependencies with no more than a second start up time. PiCloud called them environments. This is really the same problem Docker is addressing. Both were using LXC and AUFS to solve the problem. Unfortunately, Docker-as-a-service is very early days. People like orchardup.com are getting there, but so far only have hourly pricing. There is enginedock.com which has per minute pricing, but is it super early on. I'm in a "Docker gap", where these services are really not at the same level that PiCloud was. The second was the nice Python API, RESTful interface, and the command line interface for triggering off jobs, querying when the finish, and getting the results. That part will presumably be open sourced, but it is really all tied in to the hosting portion. Then the third level is to have a bunch of machine you can load balance across, to allow per second pricing on AWS. They had such lovely high memory, high CPU machines to run on. The split up some of the biggest EC2 cluster instances, and you could run each process on your 1/8 share. The nearest current replacement is iron.io's IronWorker. However, they only have 320MB per job, which doesn't work for my application. Also Heroku workers are billed per second, but they only have up to 1GB of memory. I'm hoping that this (new?) entity Multyvac can serve that role successfully. Hopefully, they'll tell us more detail on this soon. Anyway, best of luck to the PiCloud team. You were great. Especially Aaron who did much of the tech support. Thanks.
- shykes 13y ago
  Hey Craig, speaking on behalf of the docker project: we are busy filling the "docker gap" you speak about. There are currently many businesses aspiring to offer infrastructure to docker users. What we're doing is giving them a way to integrate directly into docker itself, so you can "docker run" straight to the provider of your choice, either from the docker command-line or remote API. All with minimal risk of lock-in. You might also be happy to learn that some of the talent behind Picloud is now part of the Docker team itself :)
curiouslearn 13y ago
So sad to see PiCloud go. They made parallel computation so easy to implement. Their service was really well-built.
- kkg 13y ago
  Yeah - unfortunately there aren't a ton of companies in this space, which is rough. I've started using Domino (http://www.dominoup.com http://www.dominoup.com) and it's pretty similar - probably the closest thing out there right now to PiCloud that I've seen. Worth checking out for sure.
joschu 13y ago
Love the Isaac Asimov reference in "Multyvac" I use Picloud for my CS PhD research, I hope to be able to continue with Multyvac or the open-source version.
zokier 13y ago
What's PiCloud and what's Multyvac, and what does all this mean?
gpjt 13y ago
Sorry to see these guys go, they were a great company to have in the Python space (though they did branch out to other languages, I think). When we started PythonAnywhere they were right up there on the list of potential competitors, though as it turned out our early adopters steered us more in the direction of hosting and lightweight computation (ping an API periodically and do stuff with the results) rather than heavy-duty computing. The big problem with VC backing is that they really want $1bn exits. For them, Heroku's $200MM exit to Salesforce was almost a failure. I guess they couldn't see PiCloud going that way, so they chose not to invest again. Better to put the cash into a more likely-looking moonshot. IMO this is a pity, because there are a bunch of smaller-than-$1bn but still solid companies that are getting starved of funding. The business-to-developer space is particularly prone to that kind of issue; it's less of a winner-takes-all market, so the big wins that VCs want are rarer than they are in other markets.
dwiel 13y ago
At PlotWatt, we've been using the picloud's pickler for a while in our own implementation of the picloud job queue. We don't have all of the bells and whistles that their service did, but running our own queue made it easier to control the details like the number of machines, environment and network configuration, though we tried them out first before their environments feature was set up, so they might have solved most of those problems by now. Anyway, if anyone is interested in seeing even a bare-bones python function queue based on picloud's pickler, get in touch and maybe we can open source what we have and build it out a little more. Its not open source right now just because its tied into some of our other libraries, but if there is interest, we could probably split it all up.

47 points by aseidl 13y ago

Oh man, two things: first, I wonder what DropBox will do with PiCloud, and second, I feel like a dodged a bullet. I kinda hate saying that, since it always turns up on these threads, but it's just true. I had been working seriously on converting a financial application to run on PiCloud. It's mid-November. In the hundred days until they cease operations, I would have had to deal with 10-K filings for my clients and scramble to get the hell out of there, just in time for Q1. What an absolute mess that would have been. No other time would have been much better, and I know there's an API compatible replacement in the works, but I've been there, and I'm sure something would have freaked out. Whatever happened to having some kind of reasonable transition period where the buyer continues to support all of its clients? PiCloud, your product was really neat. DropBox, I really wish you wouldn't just hit it and quit it.

cschmidt 13y ago
I think it is pretty clear from the wording it is an aqi-hire by DropBox. They are just getting a talented team. I am very close to launching Predictobot.com, which uses PiCloud for all of its computation. I spent last week moving to Heroku after DotCloud's pivot, and now I'll need to replace PiCloud. The web sure is a stable place.
- ChuckMcM 13y ago
  "The web sure is a stable place." This is an interesting variation on this round's "boomlet". So in the previous dot.com boom there were lots of companies who didn't have revenue so they appeared, until the cash ran out and then fell back to earth. Now we can start a company with much less money, but they go poof in an aquihire when things go squishy. So was it a pricing issue? or a customer acquisition issue? How is it that so many of these companies get into this squeeze? Is it a chicken -/- egg thing where you can't price it to be self sustaining until you get critical mass? Or is it that Amazon, Google, and Microsoft are just sucking all the oxygen out of this space?
- BerislavLopac 13y ago
  Which brings up another observation: when starting a business, sure take advantage of all those practical and inexpensive tools that can help you build your product in record time. But as soon as you start getting some serious traction and money (income or investment), don't hesitate to replace them with something you have more control over. Hm, it would be interesting to see open-source, self-hosted equivalents of useful services like PiCloud and the like.

kunle 13y ago

Just checked out www.multyvac.com, which has webvan, boo.com, etoys and lehman brothers listed as customers. What's the joke? Not sure I get it.

cschmidt 13y ago
I guess just that they are there to pick up the pieces from PiCloud, like someone should have done for those other failures.
vjoel 13y ago
Probably a reference to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multivac https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multivac.
vecter 13y ago
It's a reference to "The Last Question" by Isaac Asimov: http://filer.case.edu/dts8/thelastq.htm http://filer.case.edu/dts8/thelastq.htm

cschmidt 13y ago

As a very happy user of PiCloud, I'm sad to see it go. It is a shame they had such A-list VC's (Andreessen Horowitz, Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, and Greylock Partners), who don't have an interest in just a good solid business. They only wanted a huge, home run. I've been looking around for a good replacement, and there is a gap. PiCloud really had three components. The first was an ability to run code with arbitrary dependencies with no more than a second start up time. PiCloud called them environments. This is really the same problem Docker is addressing. Both were using LXC and AUFS to solve the problem. Unfortunately, Docker-as-a-service is very early days. People like orchardup.com are getting there, but so far only have hourly pricing. There is enginedock.com which has per minute pricing, but is it super early on. I'm in a "Docker gap", where these services are really not at the same level that PiCloud was. The second was the nice Python API, RESTful interface, and the command line interface for triggering off jobs, querying when the finish, and getting the results. That part will presumably be open sourced, but it is really all tied in to the hosting portion. Then the third level is to have a bunch of machine you can load balance across, to allow per second pricing on AWS. They had such lovely high memory, high CPU machines to run on. The split up some of the biggest EC2 cluster instances, and you could run each process on your 1/8 share. The nearest current replacement is iron.io's IronWorker. However, they only have 320MB per job, which doesn't work for my application. Also Heroku workers are billed per second, but they only have up to 1GB of memory. I'm hoping that this (new?) entity Multyvac can serve that role successfully. Hopefully, they'll tell us more detail on this soon. Anyway, best of luck to the PiCloud team. You were great. Especially Aaron who did much of the tech support. Thanks.

shykes 13y ago
Hey Craig, speaking on behalf of the docker project: we are busy filling the "docker gap" you speak about. There are currently many businesses aspiring to offer infrastructure to docker users. What we're doing is giving them a way to integrate directly into docker itself, so you can "docker run" straight to the provider of your choice, either from the docker command-line or remote API. All with minimal risk of lock-in. You might also be happy to learn that some of the talent behind Picloud is now part of the Docker team itself :)

curiouslearn 13y ago

So sad to see PiCloud go. They made parallel computation so easy to implement. Their service was really well-built.

kkg 13y ago
Yeah - unfortunately there aren't a ton of companies in this space, which is rough. I've started using Domino (http://www.dominoup.com http://www.dominoup.com) and it's pretty similar - probably the closest thing out there right now to PiCloud that I've seen. Worth checking out for sure.

joschu 13y ago

Love the Isaac Asimov reference in "Multyvac" I use Picloud for my CS PhD research, I hope to be able to continue with Multyvac or the open-source version.

zokier 13y ago

What's PiCloud and what's Multyvac, and what does all this mean?

gpjt 13y ago

Sorry to see these guys go, they were a great company to have in the Python space (though they did branch out to other languages, I think). When we started PythonAnywhere they were right up there on the list of potential competitors, though as it turned out our early adopters steered us more in the direction of hosting and lightweight computation (ping an API periodically and do stuff with the results) rather than heavy-duty computing. The big problem with VC backing is that they really want $1bn exits. For them, Heroku's $200MM exit to Salesforce was almost a failure. I guess they couldn't see PiCloud going that way, so they chose not to invest again. Better to put the cash into a more likely-looking moonshot. IMO this is a pity, because there are a bunch of smaller-than-$1bn but still solid companies that are getting starved of funding. The business-to-developer space is particularly prone to that kind of issue; it's less of a winner-takes-all market, so the big wins that VCs want are rarer than they are in other markets.

dwiel 13y ago

At PlotWatt, we've been using the picloud's pickler for a while in our own implementation of the picloud job queue. We don't have all of the bells and whistles that their service did, but running our own queue made it easier to control the details like the number of machines, environment and network configuration, though we tried them out first before their environments feature was set up, so they might have solved most of those problems by now. Anyway, if anyone is interested in seeing even a bare-bones python function queue based on picloud's pickler, get in touch and maybe we can open source what we have and build it out a little more. Its not open source right now just because its tied into some of our other libraries, but if there is interest, we could probably split it all up.