Do you have any reliable references for this use of Naloxone as a "lunch hour fix-ender"? I'm led to believe the administration of it isn't particularly pleasan

Do you have any reliable references for this use of Naloxone as a "lunch hour fix-ender"? I'm led to believe the administration of it isn't particularly pleasant under any circumstances, and the risk of an excessive dose causing precipitated withdrawal symptoms is probably the worst. Not to mention, the mere idea that you'd waste money by ending it early would send many users away laughing. And if you have the money and time/connections to be sourcing Naloxone on a regular basis, why not just use a short-acting opioid like Fentanyl (or even just Heroin?) In what ways would the 3-martini-equiv benzo + nominal antidote be worse than, say, 3 martini lunch? It seems like the problem is more with irresponsible people consuming drugs for recreation when they shouldn't, rather than the drugs themselves[1]. Giving such irresponsible people the ability to hide either consumption without totally reversing its effects would indeed be a net negative, but same can be argued of breath mints or dark glasses, neither of which are known to make you a better drunk-driver. Overall, I'd be deeply surprised if there wasn't something objectively better than alcohol in every way, but agreed that it's going to take society a long time and a good number of missteps to accept and adapt to it. [1] Ignoring for brevity the issues of dependence, addiction and tolerance that might require them to dose regularly, or risk even greater impairment or harm to themselves.