3 ms·
http://www.scoopler.com/search/#%22micheal+jackson%22 http://www.scoopler.com/search/#%22micheal+jackson%22
by pg 17y ago
http://www.scoopler.com/search/#%22micheal+jackson%22 http://www.scoopler.com/search/#%22micheal+jackson%22
- axod 17y agoThanks, that's actually quite a bit more useful than search.twitter.com good job scoopler :) search.twitter.com - "25,415 more results since you started searching. Refresh to see them." - Refreshing to show 25,000 new results at once doesn't seem the best way...
- JulianMorrison 17y agoSeeing them at full speed doesn't either. Firehose much?
- johnnybgoode 17y agoI'm trying to figure out if you misspelled his name on purpose, to slow down the rate of results being returned or something. ;)
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]
- aristoxenus 17y agoFunny: after a couple minutes of watching that feed for both spellings, the "Micheal" one is actually a lot more active. And indeed if you look at the "hot topic" list, the wrong spelling is winning ;)
- gojomo 17y agoGossipy people don't spell very well?