Sharing an mp3 is dramatically different from designing a similar website. When I give a song to my friend, its like I put a website in an iframe. The whole s

Sharing an mp3 is dramatically different from designing a similar website. When I give a song to my friend, its like I put a website in an iframe. The whole site is still there, attributed to the website's owner, the owner just doesn't get money for it. When I make a design that looks eerily similar to someone else's, I am trying to pass it off as my own. That's plagiarism, and that is the line that is more morally reprehensible because of the implicit deceit. That's not to say that infringing on someone else's property is not wrong, but infringing with deceit is IMO much worse than infringing without deceit.