3 ms·

you are defending this insanity? did you read the link?

• a8da6b0c91d 13y ago
  I won't specifically defend life sentences for non-violent crimes, but I would defend very harsh sentences for repeat offenses. The profiled people demonstrate terribly poor self restraint and judgment. I strongly suspect they were ongoing severe burdens on their communities in many unmentioned ways.
  • sukuriant 13y ago
    > I strongly suspect they were ongoing severe burdens on their communities in many unmentioned ways. You're painting a picture that's not connected at all with the information we've been provided and you're using it to support your personal stance. Yes, the ACLU article is presenting their story in the opposite way; but just because they're painting these people in a positive light doesn't mean that they're hiding a series of continual, unrepentant actions of which these particular crimes are the ones they were caught for. In fact, in one of the cases, the article argues that the judge didn't want to give the sentence that he gave, but his hands were tied by standards.
  • deleted 13y ago
    [deleted]
  • alan_cx 13y ago
    Life in jail for poor restrain and judgement? Are you trying to be funny? Should you get life for your post, which shows poor judgement and no ability to restrain it?