> There is absolutely no evidence that Microsoft could have done both, regardless of who was at the helm. I don't buy this argument. Anyone can say "no" instea

> There is absolutely no evidence that Microsoft could have done both, regardless of who was at the helm. I don't buy this argument. Anyone can say "no" instead of saying "yes." It was Ballmer's responsibility to green-light major products for launch, and he decided wrong time and again.