3 ms·
And that flexibility comes at a direct cost to ease of use. Particularly on a mobile with limited battery life. And can we stop with the adobe marketing bullet
by roc 17y ago
And that flexibility comes at a direct cost to ease of use.
Particularly on a mobile with limited battery life.
And can we stop with the adobe marketing bullet-point? Do real people actually -care- if they get flash on their phone?
IME what people are looking for is support of video sites that aren't youtube.
But shouldn't we be calling on those sites to support vanilla h264 and html 5 rather than h264-wrapped-in-proprietary-inefficient-mess?
Why call on -phones- to destroy our batteries trying to make that proprietary inefficient mess run acceptably?
- nailer 17y agoare you saying open source video codecs use less power? Do you have a reference for that?