5 ms·

Redisplaying YouTube content on other websites is explicitly allowed. Ads run in the embedded player, which they made easily available and usable on purpose. W

Redisplaying YouTube content on other websites is explicitly allowed. Ads run in the embedded player, which they made easily available and usable on purpose. What is NOT allowed, as far as I know, is using their API and player to make a website that does nothing but show YouTube content.

jfoster 13y ago
They do make it tricky to monetize, though. IIRC, you're not allowed to accept payments or show your own ads alongside the videos.
- janson0 13y ago
  It is actually not against their TOS to accept payments or run additional ads alongside their content.
  - hncommenter13 13y ago
    It might be, depending on what else is on the page. Clause 4(d) of the Terms of Service[1] reads: "You agree not to use the Service for any of the following commercial uses unless you obtain YouTube's prior written approval: - the sale of access to the Service; - the sale of advertising, sponsorships, or promotions placed on or within the Service or Content; or - the sale of advertising, sponsorships, or promotions on any page of an ad-enabled blog or website containing Content delivered via the Service, unless other material not obtained from YouTube appears on the same page and is of sufficient value to be the basis for such sales." [1] http://www.youtube.com/static?template=terms http://www.youtube.com/static?template=terms
    - vinceguidry 13y ago
      I subscribe to Avdi Grimm's excellent RubyTapas series, and the biggest pain about it is the lack of a web viewer. Google seems to be explicitly disallowing him to use YT, and that really sucks. Anyone looking to make and sell videos has to put them on Amazon or whatever and make you download them.
      - janson0 13y ago
        If those videos were available to be purchased from his site, or if you could subscribe to his site to get premium video content, do you think that you would do that?
        vinceguidry 13y ago
        I already pay nine bucks a month for the subscription. I found user-made scripts to download the files on his site, and did so, but that's not a real solution because I don't like storing that kind of stuff on my laptop, and Dropbox or whatever isn't any better than just getting it from his site, save having them in two places. I'd definitely pay more for a web viewer.
    - janson0 13y ago
      That last one seems to the be the kicker, right? Interesting...
wuliwong 13y ago
Last time I checked if all your are doing is repackaging their content but not adding any other content of substance to the page, it is against the TOS. This was a couple years ago but that was my understanding.
- ewillbefull 13y ago
  Yup, they can block your domain from embedding if they want.

jfoster 13y ago

They do make it tricky to monetize, though. IIRC, you're not allowed to accept payments or show your own ads alongside the videos.

janson0 13y ago
It is actually not against their TOS to accept payments or run additional ads alongside their content.
- hncommenter13 13y ago
  It might be, depending on what else is on the page. Clause 4(d) of the Terms of Service[1] reads: "You agree not to use the Service for any of the following commercial uses unless you obtain YouTube's prior written approval: - the sale of access to the Service; - the sale of advertising, sponsorships, or promotions placed on or within the Service or Content; or - the sale of advertising, sponsorships, or promotions on any page of an ad-enabled blog or website containing Content delivered via the Service, unless other material not obtained from YouTube appears on the same page and is of sufficient value to be the basis for such sales." [1] http://www.youtube.com/static?template=terms http://www.youtube.com/static?template=terms
  - vinceguidry 13y ago
    I subscribe to Avdi Grimm's excellent RubyTapas series, and the biggest pain about it is the lack of a web viewer. Google seems to be explicitly disallowing him to use YT, and that really sucks. Anyone looking to make and sell videos has to put them on Amazon or whatever and make you download them.
    - janson0 13y ago
      If those videos were available to be purchased from his site, or if you could subscribe to his site to get premium video content, do you think that you would do that?
      - vinceguidry 13y ago
        I already pay nine bucks a month for the subscription. I found user-made scripts to download the files on his site, and did so, but that's not a real solution because I don't like storing that kind of stuff on my laptop, and Dropbox or whatever isn't any better than just getting it from his site, save having them in two places. I'd definitely pay more for a web viewer.
  - janson0 13y ago
    That last one seems to the be the kicker, right? Interesting...

wuliwong 13y ago

Last time I checked if all your are doing is repackaging their content but not adding any other content of substance to the page, it is against the TOS. This was a couple years ago but that was my understanding.

ewillbefull 13y ago
Yup, they can block your domain from embedding if they want.