>Why are you guys stuck on 's' definitely being a string? Because that is the example I used. >It could just as easily be a struct or anything else imaginable

>Why are you guys stuck on 's' definitely being a string? Because that is the example I used. >It could just as easily be a struct or anything else imaginable, in which case, you're back to not knowing anything about it from the name 's' without going to look it up. If there were more information that could be conveyed, then it wouldn't be named "s". That is the entire point.