4 ms·
What is a better proxy for military power: manpower or manufacturing capacity? I'd argue that war has become as high-tech and automated as everything else, and
by jl6 13y ago
What is a better proxy for military power: manpower or manufacturing capacity? I'd argue that war has become as high-tech and automated as everything else, and you no longer need a large standing army to dominate.
- mattzito 13y agoFor certain aspects, you are correct - instead of sending in 75 infantrymen to hold a ridge, you can send in a few tanks and mechanized infantry using fewer people. However, the somewhat perverse reality is that the logistics and support requirements of the two scenarios are equal if not higher for the latter. The more technology/mechanization, the more replacement parts, ground and support staff, fuel distribution, and so on are required. On top of that, many of the very "high-tech" aspects of modern warfare that replace people have very limited utility. High tech aircraft, drones, and cruise missles can be used for tactical strikes to disrupt enemy operations, but they can't be used to hold ground.
- kissickas 13y agoIf someone is working in a factory that makes weapons, that doesn't disqualify them from taking care of their parents like being on the front lines does.