4 ms·
I have the same concern about #3 and even the viability of the certificate/coaching tier. They need to make a pretty compelling case for the certificates as a v
by psbp 13y ago
I have the same concern about #3 and even the viability of the certificate/coaching tier. They need to make a pretty compelling case for the certificates as a valid path to employment.
Though, I'm happy that they managed to find a strategy to monetization without blocking access to existing course material.
- thatthatis 13y agoCertificates solve a huge issue I've had as an e-learner - getting good credentials for the learning I do electronically. Prior to this it didn't matter how much you learned on Udacity, there wasn't a good way to signal that achievement/knowledge/learning. I'm fine overall because I have traditional credentials that speak well enough and open enough doors for me. A udacity certificate would just be icing to add to my resume. But, the learning Udacity provides is probably most valuable to people who don't have traditional credentials. And, Udacity as an institution is most valuable to the economy/society if we can use it as signals of competence for people without traditional credentials. So I find a lot of reasons to get really excited about this move. I imagine there's probably a budget/frugal hack that would work where you take the course for free, finish it, then enroll in the credential/coaching for a single month. I wouldn't be at all surprised if one-month-cost post-hoc credentialing is an intended feature of their platform.
- psbp 13y agoyep, it seems built to encourage learning and then pursuing the credentials to guarantee that enrollment stats are good.
- thatthatis 13y agoWhat do you mean "guarantee that enrollment stats are good"?