>> It's claimants duty to provide reason for his assumptions. Read the literature. Godel and many others have provided volumes supporting it. You wouldn't wal

>> It's claimants duty to provide reason for his assumptions. Read the literature. Godel and many others have provided volumes supporting it. You wouldn't walk into a physics department and claim that "black holes" are ridiculous right? Your nonchalant dismissal of the assumptions is sort of like a creationist claiming evolution is false because monkeys exist. 1. You have totally misunderstood the proof. 2. Homework: ponder why relativism is self-contradictory :).