3 ms·
That's fine. But the point is that it isn't naming things as tersely as possible, it is naming things based on the value the name provides. There is no name y
by asdasf 13y ago
That's fine. But the point is that it isn't naming things as tersely as possible, it is naming things based on the value the name provides. There is no name you can give to "s" to make it more meaningful or useful. Thus a longer name is not beneficial.
- gnaritas 13y ago> There is no name you can give to "s" to make it more meaningful or useful. Again, an opinion others don't necessarily share. > Thus a longer name is not beneficial. Again, an opinion others don't necessarily share. You seem to have a habit of stating your personal taste as fact; it is not. Some of us always prefer full words as names as a matter of style.
- asdasf 13y agoRepeating the same thing is not productive. Nobody cares about personal taste or what you do or do not prefer. That has nothing to do with the topic.
- gnaritas 13y agoRepeating the same thing is not productive. Nobody cares about your personal taste or what you do or do not prefer. That has nothing to do with the topic.