3 ms·
Vaccines are a bit of a different class as some are exempt from adverse reaction lawsuits and therefore risk is reduced for the companies manufacturing the vacc
by giarc 13y ago
Vaccines are a bit of a different class as some are exempt from adverse reaction lawsuits and therefore risk is reduced for the companies manufacturing the vaccine.
I think your assessment that my argument is "wrong" is inappropriate. You'll see that my argument is supported by the WHO (Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2011;89:88–89).
>Another reason is commercial. Antibiotics, in particular, have a poor return on investment because they are taken for a short period of time and cure their target disease. In contrast, drugs that treat chronic illness, such as high blood pressure, are taken daily for the rest of a patient’s life. “Companies have figured out that they make a lot more money selling the latter drugs than they do selling antibiotics,” Spellberg says, highlighting the lack of incentive for companies to develop antibiotics.
- Fomite 13y agoAnd yet in a recent survey of drug development costs, "Difficid", by Optimer Pharmaceuticals, was one of the most inexpensive to develop. I also really don't buy the "return on investment" argument, as curing a bacterial disease rarely provides immunity. It's also not my experience as a researcher in the area - several drug companies are actively funding research.
- giarc 13y agoFidaxo also may not be that great or cost effective[1]. Optimer, I believe has been bought by Cubist and delisted from Nasdaq. 1. Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Aug;57(4):555-61
- Fomite 13y agoI do know their most promising findings don't get reflected in clinical trials well. But "The Drug Companies aren't there" isn't addressed by a small drug company specializing in ID getting bought about by another drug company that has tons of ID products for half a billion dollars.