3 ms·
I'm not an NBA buff, but for what it's worth, it is apparently somewhat routine for insiders with direct knowledge of athlete trade deals to deliberately leak d
by novum 17y ago
I'm not an NBA buff, but for what it's worth, it is apparently somewhat routine for insiders with direct knowledge of athlete trade deals to deliberately leak details even before the deal has closed.
This particular story just has the added twist that the player in question found out via... what was the name of that website again? Oh, thanks TechCrunch!
- lionhearted 17y agoYeah, there's some potentially good business reasons to do it. It can build a buzz up for a team and some intrigue. Regular leaks - some true and some not - help executives cover their tracks and get deniablity if a player hears their general manager is trying to trade them (some players get upset, it can mess up morale). It can pressure a team to sign on a non-finalized deal because their fans want it to happen. It can create leverage for one side or the other. An executive might want to get some goodwill with a reporter, so he gives the "scoop" to them, and the reporter can pay him back with some false rumors to cover tracks or some positive PR later. Unless a player has a no-trade cause, they can usually be traded without them or their agent being told - and teams regularly "shop" players without telling the player. It causes bad will if a player finds out his team is trying to trade him, so it's kept behind the scenes until it's final or unless there's a reason for a leak. Quite common - players have seen in the newspapers or on TV that they've been traded before they or their agent are told for a long time. Twitter is just another fast public communication medium, so no surprise there.